Cervical screening self-collection should be introduced, say health experts


Professor Karen Canfell, chair of the Cancer Council Australia cancer screening and immunisation committee, said eligibility was initially restricted because available evidence suggested self-collected samples were slightly less sensitive than clinician-collected samples.

But new scientific evidence, which revealed an “equivalent sensitivity” between the two methods, had paved the way “for universal self-collection as a choice for women”, Professor Canfell said.

That same evidence prompted the Medical Services Advisory Committee to endorse universal access to self-collection in a review of the national cervical screening program.

Professor Canfell is also director of the Daffodil Centre at Sydney University, a research centre on cancer control and policy. She said universal access to self-collection would be an “international leading innovation” and “a game changer” in overcoming barriers to screening in the fight against cervical cancer.

“[Self-collection] not only has the potential to be a much more culturally sensitive way of screening but it’s also a form of self-determination for women because it offers women a measure of control and choice over their health,” she said.

Dr Nightingale said a wealth of research showed self-collection was an effective means of improving screening participation.

“We know that people who are under-screened really like [the option of self-collection] and that it engages people that would otherwise not screen,” Dr Nightingale said.

Australian Cervical Cancer Foundation chief executive Joe Tooma agreed, noting universal access to self-collection would probably “halve the percentage of women who are under or never screened”.

Associate Professor Julia Brotherton, medical director of VCS population health at the VCS Foundation, said Australia’s future success in eliminating cervical cancer as a public health problem would depend on the relative availability of self-collection.

“Self-collection is a safe and effective thing to do [and] if we want the elimination of cervical cancer to be for all women in this country, we really need to focus on those groups who are currently the most vulnerable,” Professor Brotherton said.


Four years on from her cancer diagnosis, Ms McMahon said it was “heart-breaking that women are still dying of cervical cancer when it is such a simple thing to prevent”.

On the most recent data, about 50 per cent of women are overdue for cervical screening and about 250 women die from cervical cancer in Australia each year.

The Health Department is considering the Medical Services Advisory Committee’s advice to expand self-collection.

The Morning Edition newsletter is our guide to the day’s most important and interesting stories, analysis and insights. Sign up here.

Source link


Please enter your comment!
Please enter your name here